http://tvh.disqus.com/The Virtual Handshake: Sell, Raise Capital, Look for Deals with Social MediaenFri, 10 Jul 2009 21:13:07 -0000http://www.thevirtualhandshake.com/blog/2007/08/07/a-bloggers-union-no-thanks#comment-12491108<p>sjfieifeifkslfakjdafaeiwolaksdfnknbd;lajfkjdsfnsafjei<br></p>Louis VuittonFri, 10 Jul 2009 21:13:07 -0000http://www.thevirtualhandshake.com/blog/2007/08/07/a-bloggers-union-no-thanks#comment-8724201<p>This is crazy to think that bloggers will have a union. How would this work for over 50 million blogs? Bloggers are too diverse and independent to want to be unionized. One of the beauties of blogging is the freedom to maintain your own blog with your own rules on your own time. While there may be some more organization in the blogosphere in the future, it will never go to the route of unionization.</p>Jason JacobsohnTue, 07 Aug 2007 22:49:51 -0000http://www.thevirtualhandshake.com/blog/2007/08/07/a-bloggers-union-no-thanks#comment-8724200<p>Hi Scott,</p><p>I like your category definitions! Very well defined.</p><p>I hope enough bloggers realize that this idea will kill many more opportunites in the blogosphere than it'll create. It'll widen the divide between the independent bloggers and the big mega-blogs. And everything in between (including a lot of real opportunities for independent bloggers) will just die.</p>ShaneTue, 07 Aug 2007 19:00:14 -0000http://www.thevirtualhandshake.com/blog/2007/08/07/a-bloggers-union-no-thanks#comment-8724199<p>Interesting. I doubt that bloggers will turn into workers in the near future <br>because everyone is doing it for their own interest, thus lending to <br>entrepreneurship.</p>Dan SchawbelTue, 07 Aug 2007 08:46:34 -0000