<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>thevirtualhandshake - Latest Comments in Free Speech and Censorship in Online Communities</title><link>http://tvh.disqus.com/</link><description>The Virtual Handshake: Sell, Raise Capital, Look for Deals with Social Media</description><atom:link href="https://tvh.disqus.com/free_speech_and_censorship_in_online_communities_91/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:10:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Free Speech and Censorship in Online Communities</title><link>http://www.thevirtualhandshake.com/blog/2007/01/02/free-speech-and-censorship-in-online-communities#comment-21604310</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Art  is a lie that tells the truth &lt;a href="http://www.olugg.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-481.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.olugg.com/ugg-knightsbridge-c-481.html"&gt;ugg knightsbridge&lt;/a&gt;. Humor has been well defined as &lt;a href="http://www.olugg.com/ugg-womens-lo-pro-button-c-473.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.olugg.com/ugg-womens-lo-pro-button-c-473.html"&gt;ugg lo pro button&lt;/a&gt; thinking in  fun while feeling in earnest.The decline of literature indicates the decline of  an &lt;a href="http://www.olugg.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.olugg.com/"&gt;ugg boots &lt;/a&gt; nation ; the two &lt;a href="http://www.olugg.com/ugg-bailey-button-c-472.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.olugg.com/ugg-bailey-button-c-472.html"&gt;ugg bailey button&lt;/a&gt; keep in their &lt;a href="http://www.olugg.com/ugg-classic-mini-c-6.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.olugg.com/ugg-classic-mini-c-6.html"&gt;uggs boots &lt;/a&gt; downward  tendency.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ly2005</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:10:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Speech and Censorship in Online Communities</title><link>http://www.thevirtualhandshake.com/blog/2007/01/02/free-speech-and-censorship-in-online-communities#comment-18239435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The podniecający kontrast element w Trzeci Zegarek ciągnąć &lt;a href="http://www.whycostas.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.whycostas.com"&gt;Third Watch dvd&lt;/a&gt; sytuacja egzystencjalna człowieka the powierzchnia i exposé ono the światło prawda. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">girlteam</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:58:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Speech and Censorship in Online Communities</title><link>http://www.thevirtualhandshake.com/blog/2007/01/02/free-speech-and-censorship-in-online-communities#comment-12492924</link><description>&lt;p&gt;pornography, among other things. For example, &lt;a href="http://WordPress.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="WordPress.com"&gt;WordPress.com&lt;/a&gt; prohibits the use of PayPerPost. Is that a violation of a blogger’’s right to free speech?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Under the Uniform Commercial Code, we all have the right to voluntary restrict our free speech by contract, and when we join an online community we are doing just that — subject to whatever the terms of service are. In fact, the contract doesn”t even have to be explicitily signed in order to be in effect. Consider that when you walk into a theater or restaurant, you give up some of your free speech rights. Do anything that is significantly unpleasant to other patrons — talk too loudly, let your kids run wild, etc. — and you”ll be warned and eventually ejected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why would anyone expect an online community to be any different?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You do have the right of free speech, but the owners of a community also have the right to establish and enforce codes of conduct within the community, and be joining that community, your right of contract supercedes your right of free speech.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So when you find yourself bumping up against the boundaries of behavior in an online community, you might want to consider whether that community is really the right community for you. If so, then you can either adapt your behavior to the code of conduct or you can use persuasive means to try to change the code of conduct. But don”t make cries of “Censorship!” — you gave up that right when you joined.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Posted by Scott Allen    &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Vuitton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:42:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Speech and Censorship in Online Communities</title><link>http://www.thevirtualhandshake.com/blog/2007/01/02/free-speech-and-censorship-in-online-communities#comment-12492136</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bottom line, the advice to always use an excerpt and a link should be safe anywhere&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Louis Vuitton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:07:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Speech and Censorship in Online Communities</title><link>http://www.thevirtualhandshake.com/blog/2007/01/02/free-speech-and-censorship-in-online-communities#comment-8724138</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The links for the above comment did not show...here they are again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;November 20, 2006&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;California Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Free Speech on the Internet &lt;br&gt;Read the full article here: &lt;a href="http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_11.php#005017" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_11.php#005017"&gt;http://www.eff.org/news/arc...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read this page...its good!&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.eff.org/Censorship/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.eff.org/Censorship/"&gt;http://www.eff.org/Censorship/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jennifer Cannon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:55:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Speech and Censorship in Online Communities</title><link>http://www.thevirtualhandshake.com/blog/2007/01/02/free-speech-and-censorship-in-online-communities#comment-8724137</link><description>&lt;p&gt;THE FUTURE OF FREE SPEECH ON THE INTERNET IS AGAIN AT RISK: HOUSE COMMERCE COMMITTEE TO VOTE ON CENSORSHIP BILL&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is brought to you by the Citizens Internet Empowerment Coalition and the Center for Democracy and Technology.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A little more than a year after the Supreme Court struck down Congress' last attempt to censor the Net, it's deja vu all over again -- a Congressional committee is poised to vote on a bill that threatens to chill free speech on the Internet. Like the unconstitutional Communications Decency Act, the Child Online Protection Act (HR 3783), sponsored by Rep. Michael Oxley (R-OH,) is offered in the name of protecting children from harmful content online.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;______________________________________________________ &lt;br&gt;November 20, 2006&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;California Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Free Speech on the Internet&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;San Francisco - In what is a victory for free speech on the Internet, the California Supreme Court ruled today that no provider or user of an interactive computer service may be held liable for putting material on the Internet that was written by someone else. In doing so, the Court overruled an earlier decision by the Court of Appeal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Today's ruling affirms that blogs, websites, listservs, and ISPs like Yahoo!, as well as individuals like defendant Ilena Rosenthal, are protected under Section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act (CDA), which explicitly states that "[n]o provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the full case here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;_____________________________________________________&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here is an interesting page on this subject:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Censorship and the Internet&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jennifer Cannon&lt;br&gt;CEO/Founder/Owner: &lt;a href="http://www.BusinessIIBusiness.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.BusinessIIBusiness.com"&gt;www.BusinessIIBusiness.com&lt;/a&gt; (Business Owner Networking)&lt;br&gt;CEO/Owner: &lt;a href="http://www.LegnaMarketing.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.LegnaMarketing.com"&gt;www.LegnaMarketing.com&lt;/a&gt; (E-News &amp;amp; Promotional Marketing)&lt;br&gt;Leader/Moderator: BusinessIIBusiness Owners Network Ryze&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jennifer Cannon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:52:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Speech and Censorship in Online Communities</title><link>http://www.thevirtualhandshake.com/blog/2007/01/02/free-speech-and-censorship-in-online-communities#comment-8724136</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ahhhh - free speech&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;as well as to speak&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;or not to speak&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;that is the question -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and then web site -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;blog&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;or forum -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well, to speak here or not on the particular topic is a freedom that I am allowed as a member&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To express an opinion that may differ or contradict or even portray a different perspective is definitely a freedom&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;to interrupt with a different topic&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;or a profanity or some other innaporopriate distraction from a discussion &lt;br&gt;those would be rude&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and to argue or fight with a person either as the originator of a topic blasting a person with a differing viewpoint or as a commentor blasting the originator of a topic - well - that wouldn't do under any circumstance&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;however there is a fine point of distinction that gets untroduced online which is not the same as it might be off line or in the non virtual world - and that lies in the interpretation of a person's intent when actually hearing their voice -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I believe that often some of the issues or conflicts that people may be having with others stems from an innability to hear the other person's tone of voice and instead what might be happening - well they just might be injecting the tone of their thoughts or their fears or for whatever reason misinterpreting what it is that another might be attempting to convey -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is a fact - that relatively speaking - writing and expressing thoughts in the manner in which it is done on the Internet whether on a web site -a blog or in a forum is a relatively new phenomenon in the long history of human communication (including the art of writing letters and business communications and public realtions) and the extent to which this art is mastered by each individual that is attempting to utilize this medium to convey or get across their ideas to others varies greatly with the extent to which they have mastered the new skill.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Were there classes or courses to teach people various skills in this art - then perhaps there might be better communications in the various arenas where this skill must be utilized -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Otherwise the learning is to be left up to those doing the doing -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;thank you!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Walter&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Walter Paul Bebirian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:42:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>