<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>thevirtualhandshake - Latest Comments in Orkut vs. other social networks</title><link>http://tvh.disqus.com/</link><description>The Virtual Handshake: Sell, Raise Capital, Look for Deals with Social Media</description><atom:link href="https://tvh.disqus.com/orkut_vs_other_social_networks/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2004 10:59:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Orkut vs. other social networks</title><link>http://www.thevirtualhandshake.com/blog/2004/01/31/orkut-vs-other-social-networks#comment-8723415</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great addition.  Wish I had thought to use the words context rather than contrast!  Maybe it is just a game!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stuart Henshall</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2004 10:59:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Orkut vs. other social networks</title><link>http://www.thevirtualhandshake.com/blog/2004/01/31/orkut-vs-other-social-networks#comment-8723414</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it can mix, but you have to design it very carefully. You have to have some defaults for each case that set a bunch of different privacy settings globally in different ways, then allow the user to fine tune it after the basic settings are set.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm somewhat wishful that only one of these social network services will survive a shake out, as I want to concentrate on the value of the 'weak links' in my network, rather then to have to manage multiple networks, multiple resumes, multiple personal info. However, I'm increasingly doubtful that the shake out will happen soon, there are too many VCs pooring money into this category.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Allen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2004 21:42:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Orkut vs. other social networks</title><link>http://www.thevirtualhandshake.com/blog/2004/01/31/orkut-vs-other-social-networks#comment-8723413</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with you, Christopher -- I have a real problem even being &lt;i&gt;asked&lt;/i&gt; if I think Joi Ito or Marc Canter is "sexy". Business &amp;amp; social can mix, and social and romantic can mix, but I just don't think that business and romantic mix well in a social networking environment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I could be wrong, though -- maybe there's a new niche waiting to happen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Allen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2004 20:25:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Orkut vs. other social networks</title><link>http://www.thevirtualhandshake.com/blog/2004/01/31/orkut-vs-other-social-networks#comment-8723412</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My problem with Orkut right now is that it is trying to be everything to everyone, but doesn't try to mask that which you don't want give, or what you don't want to see. As I point out in my blog entry &lt;a href="http://www.lifewithalacrity.com/2004/01/insecurity_at_o.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.lifewithalacrity.com/2004/01/insecurity_at_o.html"&gt;http://www.lifewithalacrity...&lt;/a&gt; Orkut asks and displays a lot of personal information for someone who has specified that he isn't using Orkut for dating.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Allen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2004 20:12:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>